Notifications
Clear all
Search result for: ford edge
Page 14 / 14
Prev
| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| Answer to: Ford Maverick engine | 15Relevance | 4 years ago | Dan | Submit Your Question HERE | |
| Generally modern hybrids are good at both, much better economy than a petrol with similar driving characteristics. ford Maverick It’s built on the same platform and shares most of its parts with the European ford Focus. It’s based on a small European market family car, has nothing to do with ford’s other trucks or trucks in general. Thats not a good thing considering how mediocre and of bellow-average reliability other cars on the same platform have generally been. 2.5 Hybrid According to a review on Youtube the Maverick hybrid does about 38MPG (if ... | |||||
| Answer to: 1999 ford taurus SHO as project car? | 15Relevance | 5 years ago | Dan | Submit Your Question HERE | |
| It was a long marriage, but ford has also been collaborating with other designers. For example, on their DURATEC V6 engines, "The primary engineering input came from Porsche (...) and Cosworth, who helped with cylinder head manufacturing", Personally I think it's a great engine, one of the best ones out there. Also, the ford Sigma was developed in collaboration with Yamaha, while the Duratec HE was developed by Mazda, the DuraToruq developed with PSA, with the 5 cylinder DuraToruq variants being developed by Volvo, the ford Duratec SE was also developed ... | |||||
| Answer to: 1st gen Ford Escape | 15Relevance | 6 years ago | Kerem | Submit Your Question HERE | |
| (This is the next generation but answers still apply, its basically the same reliability wise) They have particuarly horrible automatic transmissions. I wouldn't recommend anyone to buy one. Otherwise they are OK. Definitely don't get the hybrid variants. FWIW, check out some of the carcomplaints data... "They’re definitely not as well made as a Toyota RAV4 or a Honda CR-V." Yeah, not even close. The only way I could recommend this car would be if its dirt cheap and a mechanic says the transmission is in good shape. I can't even imagine how many transmissions commerical ones in NYC have gone through... | |||||
| Answer to: Ford Cmax? | 15Relevance | 6 years ago | Kerem | Submit Your Question HERE | |
| Hybrids have more technology that tend to burn wallets as they age. With Toyota hybrids this can happen 150-250k miles. As for ford, I wouldn't be recommending their regular passenger cars, let alone a hybrid. ford doesn't care to make a good car, especially in the last decade, and they don't know how to make a hybrid. They just don't. As for the hybrids in NY, we have a previous thread about Escape hybrids and their taxi longevity, but in short commerical use is a whole different topic. They rarely have the original powertrain at that mileage. They have dif ... | |||||
| Answer to: 12 Ford Fusion reliability | 15Relevance | 6 years ago | Kerem | Submit Your Question HERE | |
| Well ok so it is based on a Volvo/Ford/Mazda platform and they are decent cars in general. Now you can find common issues and reliability reports by clicking here: I see that they did have major power steering, transmission, and engine issues. I would look for a 2009 model before the refresh they are more reliable. To look at overall reports: I would also read this: Hope these links and information helps! | |||||
Page 14 / 14
Prev