Car Questions

2003 Manual Mazda 6...
 
Notifications
Clear all

2003 Manual Mazda 6, good or bad idea? (Or cars that are

  

0
Topic starter

Simply put, I found a 2003 Mazda 6 with 110k+ mikes on it that’s in phenomenal condition, no rust, and almost no body damage whatsoever (And it looks great!)

So my biggest question is, (besides avoiding common scams), is this a good idea? This will be my second car, and the first car that I will own.

 

If not (or you have other suggestions too), what would be some reliable cars that are within the price range of about $3-$4k?

 

Thanks!


3 Answers
4

Their not bad cars but they generally don't hold up as well as some others. Keep up with the maintenance and fluid changes and stuff and it should last you a while. 

 

https://www.autotempest.com/results?make=honda&zip=90210&maxprice=4000&maxyear=2005&maxmiles=100000&bodystyle=sedan Looks like you might be able to find a honda that similar. If you can find a honda for a better deal take it. They will last you a lot longer if well maintained. 


2

My father owned an '06 Mazda 6 and liked it quite a bit! The only problems he ran into was coolant occasionally leaking and the automatic transmission shifting rough. It wasn't a very comfortable car but pretty reliable and sporty. Overall, sounds like a solid purchase given the criteria.

Every Mazda I've owned, the automatic transmission was really iffy. Definitely go for the manual.

If you are looking for a comfortable and solid built car, an early 2000s Toyota Camry or Lexus ES300 is where it's at.


0

I think it is too much money for 17 years old Mazda and as the above comments say, you can find a better car with Toyota or Honda that can outlast this Mazda by far without specific issues.


Share: