Hey Scotty, I have a 2005 Honda Civic 1.6 L engine, 40,000km only on the odo.
I wanted to ask whether I need to change my brake fluid because I think it has never been changed in the 18 years of the life of car, and also the brake pedal feels slightly harder/ more stiff compared to a newer car that i drive also.
And whether I should stick to Honda Genuine BF DOT3 or is DOT 4 better to use.
Thanks
Probably not a bad idea, though a lot of people get away with never doing it. DOT3 is fine if that's what the manufacturer calls for.
You can test moisture content first if you like with test strips or an electronic tester. The sample should be drawn from a caliper or wheel cylinder though since moisture tends to collect in the lowest part of the system.
At that age I would change it out and bleed the brakes good. I wouldn't bother using honda brake fluid myself, and I would just use Dot 3. Dot 4 is better for higher temperatures, but it is more hygroscopic than dot 3.
So that means that DOT 3 is better if I want to avoid the trouble of changing my brake fluid more often, due to the fact that DOT 4 will absorb more moisture.
Which brand of Brake fluid due you remember, will Honda genuine do the job
Yeah I would stick with Dot 3. As far as brand, I have never heard of having to use the OEM brake fluid from Honda. For transmission, yes Honda is often what you should go with. Hopefully others will chime in if they know for sure.
ok thanks
I usually do it every 3 or 4 years, though admittedly there have been times I've let it slip longer than that and had no problems.