Car Questions

2011 Tahoe vs Sequo...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] 2011 Tahoe vs Sequoia

  

0
Topic starter

Which is more reliable, the 2009-2014 Tahoe, with the six speed automatic, or the second generation Sequoia, 4.6 or 5.7 equipped. I would imagine the Toyota is more reliable but I remember Scotty and Car wizard too saying that Toyota V8s had issues when they got older. They never really specified which engines though. I also know about GM DOD / AFM but I have heard conflicting things about when they had it or not.


6 Answers
1

They would both suit you well however the Sequoia would outlast the Tahoe by far. If you find one with low miles they can run for a long time.


4

Definitely Toyota is better. The issues about V8 Toyota are expenses. They are more expensive to repair than V6 but if you need a V8, in my opinion, Toyota is the best option. 


Thanks 👍


You're welcome.


1

The Sequoia is probably better  but those Tahoes are pretty good despite all the chevy hate (often in this forum)

 

I friend mine has a Tahoe with like 250K on it


Which model year Tahoe? The 2nd generation (model years 2000-2006) were more solid and can last longer than the 3rd Gen (model years 2007-2014) which adopted cylinder deactivation technology (AFM).


I think his is 04 0r 05


1

Sequoia easily gets my vote on this one.


0
Topic starter

Both of the vehicles I have found have around 170k so I think either would be fine, now I just have to test drive! Thank y'all for your answers!


0

If you care about longevity and minimal issues, I would go with the Sequoia.  That generation Tahoe (and newer of course) has cylinder deactivation technology (AFM) and can wear out/damage the engine over time.  It’s a technology GM never perfected.  Why take the risk now?  Also, GM electronics is not a strong suit so expect potential electrical issues with age/mileage.  The previous generation (model years 2000-2006) is a much better buy over the newer (model year 2007+) Tahoes.  That’s also the time GM quality really started a long downhill decline.  You mention both are 170,000 miles - that’s another knock against the Tahoe, as it’s past it’s useful lifespan before just becoming a money pit.


Share: